Another boondoggle for corporate America...
At the expense of the average American. It’s called an HSA health insurance plan. I have a real soft spot in my heart for these plans, seeing that I and my family are victims – I mean participants – of such a plan.
These HSA (health savings account) plans are touted as a method to give Americans greater flexibility on their healthcare spending, and allows participants to "save" money in a bank account, which can then be used to pay for health care not covered by the insurance portion of the plan.
What Bush & Co. (who have been the champions of this approach) don't tell you is that the main beneficiaries of this type of plan are the financial institutions that "manage" the HSA accounts (translates to: "make lots of profits off of other people's money"), and the employers who offer these plans to their employees.
Why is it advantageous to the employers? Because they get to write off their employee's contributions to the HSA accounts on their taxes. That's right, they get to take credit for the employee contributions as EMPLOYER contributions. In the case of my company, they have 4000 employees corporate-wide. At an average of about $2000 annually set aside by employees for their HSA accounts, that's an $8,000,000.00 tax write-off for the company.
Nice perk eh? And of course my company, like all the other companies who will jump on this corporate welfare bandwagon, pretty much shoved the plan down the employee’s throat. In the name of “maintaining consistency” across the corporation, they eliminated all other plans that were available to employees. After all, the more employees in this plan, the bigger their tax break. Makes sense.
The other corporate advantage to an HSA plan: You have to meet your entire deductible (excluding “qualifying” preventative care) before the insurance company has to pay a dime of benefits. They are often referred to as HDHP HSA Plans. The HDHP? It stands for “High Deductible Health Plan”. As a matter of fact, to qualify as an HSA plan, there is a MINIMUM deductible for both individual and family. Here’s the requirement:
“A qualified HSA plan has a single deductible that applies to all medical expenses covered by the insurance policy whether you are insuring yourself or an entire family. This deductible must be satisfied each year before the insurance company pays on any medical claims. The single deductible for an individual must be a minimum of $1,050 and can be any deductible up to the maximum out-of-pocket limit of $5,250 and the single deductible for a family must be at least $2,100 up to the maximum out-of-pocket limit of $10,500 for the year 2006.”
I’m so glad Bush & Co. are making sure to cover the insurance companies. Too bad they’re not as interested in making sure that actual health care gets covered. Gosh, combined with the Medicare Drug Plan windfall for pharmaceutical and insurance companies, this President is really doing great things for corporate America… As usual, at the expense of the American people.
4 Comments:
The insurance coverage in America is a bad joke. As a business they have to make profit and provide shareholder value, but it's at the expense of their customers. Corporations have found that to decrease expenses, their first and easiest ploy is to eliminate pensions and other benefits, then downsize, then reduce salaries (but not of upper management). Insurance companies have the added option of cutting services to customers (imagine any other company pulling that?). So, in effect, they're in the business to make money, not provide a serice to their customers. Gee, it's a good thing some forms of insurance are mandatory in this country! And do the government hacks want to help people afford insurance? Why bother? The rich can afford the best care possible already.
Time for a revolution, my friend. Blood will run red in the streets!
I'm not sure I'm understanding your problem here. Most employers are also contributing to those accounts as well, although they DO save money.
What you failed to mention is that MANY of those traditional health plans still allow for you to have a maximum out of pocket expense of $1500-$2000. So, you're paying three times as much in premimums, only to have to pay out the same amount of your cash, only this time, it's not pre-tax. Now - there are cases, where they don't make sense - yours may be one, but to assume that they are simply some evil Republican plot to help out corporate America is foolish. For me personally, I save a ton on premiums, and, while still covered in case of a catastrophe, get to manage more of my health care dollars myself.
and, for the record, insurance companies hate these...they make billions off of your current premiums - they don't want to lose that. They make nothing off HSA's. The HSA administrators make a few dollars a month off your account in fees, and the rest comes through investing those funds (which you see a return on as well) - just like your bank does with any other savings account.
check out my site: http://www.hsatruth.com if you want to learn more.
Anonymous said...
"I'm not sure I'm understanding your problem here."
Okay, well let me see if I can explain it to you... The lion's share of the contributions made to my HSA account are MY MONEY. My employer contributes some of the funds as well, but not nearly as much as I do. Yet my company claims ALL OF THE CONTRIBUTIONS as their own for tax purposes.
My max out of pocket (in network) is $5000. Out of network is $10,000. So I wouldn't compare the pittance that you showed of $1500-$2000. And I do pay just as much in premiums as I did with a traditional plan. Slightly more, in fact.
The insurance companies don't make anything off of the HSA bank account, that's true. But they didn't make money on "out of pocket" expenses from traditional plans either.
I'll sum it up again. See if you can follow along...
I pay MORE in premiums. I pay a LARGER out of pocket. My company takes tax credit for MY CONTRIBUTIONS. Which part of this don't you understand?
"check out my site: http://www.hsatruth.com if you want to learn more."
Learn more? Spare me. I'm living the nightmare. hsatruth eh? I told the truth. Try spinning that.
I noticed your comments on the airamerica site and thought I'd share the next part of the Lee Iacocca interview with you...
Q:How would you rate the priorities Bush and his friends have set?
Lee Iacocca:Forget the economy, global warming, our infrastructure of roads and bridges that are rotting away. And forget health care, which is a scandal, and is our Achilles heel. A civilization that doesn’t take care of its young people and their young minds through education, and that doesn’t take care of its aging parents? Do you think our priority was going to Iraq, really? They didn’t have nuclear bombs that I knew of. We’re in a war we should never have gotten into, and yet they haven’t resolved the nuclear powers like North Korea and Iran, so the priorities are wrong. Meanwhile, it’s going to be a half-trillion-dollar war in Iraq. And we brought what to them? Democracy? I think we brought them civil war. We’re after oil. Hitler bombed the hell out of Romania because he wanted the oil fields. Before Pearl Harbor, we forget how we were twisting the Japanese in the wind and shutting off their oil supply. No matter what you talk about, every real confrontation is based on fossil fuel because we’re just hooked on it. Selling nukes to India? Common sense has gone out the window. You can tap my phone without a warrant? Where is the media? I would think they’d be outraged at the way they’ve been conned. And the Democratic Party is sitting on its hands. What are they doing, worrying about running Hillary? Where is our country headed?
Q: We have plenty of opinions on that score, but we’d rather hear yours.
Lee Iacocca: When I go to Europe, they love Americans but they hate Bush and think he’s nuts. Through the debacle of Iraq, I would have first fired all his speechmakers. “Shock and awe,” “axis of evil,” “dead or alive”? That’s old Europe, not new Europe. How can you write s--- like that without insulting your friends? Those are fighting words. [Bush] had to call his nanny, Karen Hughes, back from Texas because he needed her to write speeches for Iraq and she wrote most of that s---. It’s time for the press and the loyal opposition, the Democrats, to be enraged and obnoxious. I think the press should stop all this political correctness and just tell it the way it is and not worry where the chips fall. I’m asked to speak at a lot of college commencements, and you don’t want to scare these kids, but we’re in debt for trillions and leaving them the mortgage, saying, in effect, “You pay it back.” Instead of “shock and awe,” we ought to be saying things like, “Cool the rhetoric” and asking, “Where have all the thinkers gone?”
Post a Comment
<< Home